From af34eb43a18d5f68896ec10ab5405a154ac0d14e Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: "kaf24@firebug.cl.cam.ac.uk" Date: Tue, 21 Mar 2006 15:40:54 +0100 Subject: [PATCH] Nanosecs not usecs in a time comment. Signed-off-by: Keir Fraser --- linux-2.6-xen-sparse/arch/i386/kernel/time-xen.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/linux-2.6-xen-sparse/arch/i386/kernel/time-xen.c b/linux-2.6-xen-sparse/arch/i386/kernel/time-xen.c index da853b1939..4beea38423 100644 --- a/linux-2.6-xen-sparse/arch/i386/kernel/time-xen.c +++ b/linux-2.6-xen-sparse/arch/i386/kernel/time-xen.c @@ -157,7 +157,7 @@ static int __init __independent_wallclock(char *str) } __setup("independent_wallclock", __independent_wallclock); -/* Permitted clock jitter, in usecs, beyond which a warning will be printed. */ +/* Permitted clock jitter, in nsecs, beyond which a warning will be printed. */ static unsigned long permitted_clock_jitter = 10000000UL; /* 10ms */ static int __init __permitted_clock_jitter(char *str) { -- 2.30.2